Car accidents that trigger injuries have actually happened practically because cars were invented. The very first tape-recorded unintentional injury occurred in 1869. An Irish female named Mary Ward was thrown away of the steam-powered carriage she was riding in when it hit an especially deep rut in the road. She was instantly squashed by one of the wheels, her injuries causing a rapid death. Her cousin had in fact been the inventor of this new type of automobile, in a terrible example of paradox. Elia & Ponto is always ready to help you with any motor vehicle accident case you or a loved one was involved in.
Over the last 25 years approximately, automobile accident injuries leading to deaths have actually decreased an impressive 50% around the world. This is due mostly to increased focus by both federal governments and automobile manufacturers on security, consisting of the basic usage of air bags to lower the variety of serious injuries and deaths brought on by front and side car-to-car collisions.
Unfortunately, the United States is among the few countries where injuries and fatalities triggered by vehicles have increased over this very same period. Experts suggest that this has numerous causes, consisting of an increased number of vehicle drivers overall, a stable boost in the number of big trucks and SUVs offered, and a sharp rise in the numbers of individuals using mobile phone and other technological devices while driving their vehicles. Elia & Ponto is a leading Michigan car accident law firm with years of experience.
Another common reason for car mishap injuries is ‘rubbernecking.’ This is the term for decreasing (often unexpectedly) to look at an unusual situation occurring on the road (or nearby). Typically, people do this to check out car mishaps, which can cause other drivers further back who are not paying attention to fail to slow down or drop in time. Rubbernecking is the # 1 reason for all rear-end car accidents and, in specific, whiplash injuries, in the United States.
Automobile accident prevention developed to decrease injury and casualty numbers focuses on technology and altering human habits while behind the wheel. Modern vehicles and trucks are geared up with air bags, and distance and drift displays are becoming more typical too. Both produce loud tones to signal the automobile’s motorist that the vehicle is entering a hazardous area. In Europe, this has actually been shown to lower unexpected injuries from both car-to-car accidents and single-car mishaps.
Changing motorist behaviors to minimize vehicle mishaps is a harder nut to fracture – particularly in the United States, where automobile ownership is embedded in the culture. People spend a lot time in their cars and trucks today that it leads to a sense of invulnerability. The subsequent lack of protective driving is among the reasons why unintentional injuries from automobile collisions in America are bucking the around the world downward pattern.
Perhaps remarkably, U.S. specifies with less limiting speed limit laws really have a slightly lower incidence of vehicle mishaps that trigger injuries or deaths. This can partially be described by a lower number of cars and trucks on the road per capita vs. some of the states with lower speed limits. Nevertheless, even when adjusted for this result, the statistics still show a minor edge to states with higher limits. Advocates of stricter enforcement of published speed limitations may be pursuing the wrong strategy, if the objective is the prevention of vehicle accident injuries.
A better method to mishap prevention need to most likely concentrate on two locations that lead to numerous serious vehicle mishaps: motorist distractions and age.
Cellular phones are becoming the biggest distraction, and a growing number of states are prohibiting their use by the driver while the lorry remains in movement. Even if you live where it is acceptable, it’s an exceptionally bad concept! Current studies have shown a clear connection between phone use and car accidents. Visit Elia & Ponto for help with Michigan car accident cases.
Chauffeur age has an intriguing correlation with car mishaps that cause injuries and deaths. At both ends of the spectrum, ages 16-20 and 70+, a much greater portion of accidents take place than with other age ranges. Mishap prevention based upon the driver’s age is not quickly implemented, but calls by the public and advocacy groups are on the increase.
Some tips include compulsory motorist education courses, yearly driver assessments to reassess abilities, and even a magnetic sticker or decal on all cars driven by an individual falling under either age group. The latter entails the concept that signaling other chauffeurs will increase their protective driving attention, decreasing the frequency of accidents.